On Fri, Apr 2, 2021, at 17:53, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Better done with the morning coffee than late at night :-) > > I suggest the following options and ordering to appear on the ballot: > > [A] Call for the FSF board removal, as in rms-open-letter.github.io > (proposed by Steve Langasek, currently base proposal) > > [B] Call for Stallman's resignation from FSF all bodies > (proposed by Sruthi Chandran, currently proposal B) > > [C] Discurage collaboration with the FSF while Stallman is in a leading > position > (proposed by Santiago Ruano Rincón, currently proposal C) > > [D] Call on the FSF to further its governance processes > (proposed by Jonathan Wiltshire, currently proposal D) > > [E] Debian will not issue a public statement on this issue > (proposed by Timo Weingärtner, currently proposal E) > > [F] Support Stallman's reinstatement, as in rms-support-letter.github.io > (proposed by Timo Weingärtner, currently proposal A) > > My reasoning for this suggested ordering is to present the options > ordered, from most strongly against to most strongly in support of > Stallman. They could also be presented in the inverse order, if it > seems that proposed options [E] and [F] are too underrepresented and > left to the endto the end.
I would suggest moving proposal E to the top or to the bottom of the ballot, as one can argue that this "status quo" option doesn't really fit within the "condemn → support" axis you've proposed. I think I agree with how the other options are ordered. Thanks, -- Nicolas Dandrimont