Charles> - About the sponsors, if there are too many, then the
Charles> proposer is more at risk to face vetos when accepting
Charles> amendments. (I write that as I accepted major changes as
Charles> the proposer of a GR option some years ago.) Would it make
Charles> sense to limit the total number of sponsors, and to only
Charles> allow developers to sponsor one option ?
I don't understand this concern very well.
If some of your sponsors don't like an amendment you accepted you can
withdraw.
So long as you have k sponsors remaining, the option can stay on the
ballot.
What am I missing that leads to your concern?
