Roberto C. Sánchez <robe...@debian.org> wrote on 15/03/2023 at 20:10:01+0100:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 12:00:55PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: >> Thomas, >> >> Thank you for this post. I found it an informative read. >> >> My personal opinion is that Debian is not the proper venue for discussions >> that do not have a strong nexus to development of Debian itself. As such, I >> don’t feel that any of the emails or posts you wrote were appropriate for >> sending to Debian’s email lists or posting on Debian websites except for the >> email questions about how Debian can best handle the increasing difficulty >> caused by laws that prohibit the free-flow of contributions and software >> between countries (your email of 3 April 2022). >> >> However much I might agree with the factual content of the other emails and >> posts, I don’t think it serves Debian well to get involved in controversial >> topics unless they directly impact the operation of Debian itself (for >> example, laws related to copyright or patents). >> > Yet, would someone posting about the earth being flat, the moon landings > being faked, or aliens being kept in various secret government > facilities around the world have been so swiftly removed from the > project? I sincerely hope so. We have already a lot of energy invested in our daily lives to not lose more in Debian about non-scientific garbage. Debian is not for that, and no place should be used for that anyway. -- PEB
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
