>>>>> "Matthias" == Matthias Urlichs <[email protected]> writes:
Matthias> On 29.08.26 15:46, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> Undisclosed AI usage in code/emails/bts/... is not something I
>> would call "Responsible Use", but I have to accept that the
>> majority has decided that this is OK in Debian.
Matthias> Neither would I — but as long as there is a non-zero risk
Matthias> that a maintainer will not look at my bug report, solely
Matthias> because there's a "Co-Authored-By: GLM 5.2" at the bottom
Matthias> …
Or how about if I move to using a llm-based TTS engine like (vibevoice
or qwen-tts) for my screen reader?
Do I really need to disclose that all my contributions are assisted by
AI because of accessibility technology I use?
I'm moving towards having a transcription model (the one I use happens
to be an autoregressive transformer) take voice recorded blog posts and
transcribe them and then an LLM do some markdown formatting.
Especially if I review the final result of that and the LLM didn't
generate any significant text, I'm probably not going to disclose that
as AI generated.
There are some cases where there are interesting boundaries.
