Matthias Urlichs <[email protected]> wrote on 31/08/2026 at 04:45:46+0200:
> On 31.08.26 01:56, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: >>> Neither would I — but as long as there is a non-zero risk that a >>> maintainer will not look at my bug report, solely because there's a >>> "Co-Authored-By: GLM 5.2" at the bottom … >> As if it wasn't immediately clear in most cases… > > I wrote "Co-authored", not "written by and blindly forwarded". > > Also, with some care (which I'd like to expect from DDs who use them) / system > prompt editing you can actually tell these things to trim their text walls to > a > mostly-reasonable level. Let's be fair, most of the AI-driven reports we got in the past two years are pure garbage. But I still read them in diagonal. If you put an explicit co-author, I will definitely read it more seriously as it means you are explicit about the help you got from an LLM. And if indeed you steered the wheel for the report edition in general the quality is correct, so it's fine. -- PEB
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
