On 01/09/2012 01:17 PM, Aron Xu wrote: >> So we could actually drop all the build system related stuff in >> debian/copyright? This would make it much more simpler. >> > > Yes for the default build system files generated by autotools. > >>> 2.For files that have multiple licenses, for example MPL-1.1, GPL-2+ >>> and LGPL-2.1+, >>> we need to add the "license block" in d/copyright, also including the >>> actual text of >>> those three licenses. >> >> Isn't it enough the way it is? We have the text of all three licenses in an >> extra block and the files are marked appropriately. >> > > It's probably enough, but better to have all the given information included. > >> We probably should ask upstream to clarify the copyright status of >> src/*.[c,h]. >> Most of the files seam to be modified a lot. >> > > It will be great to do so.
If nobody beats me I'll take care of this on Thursday or Friday. Kind regards, -- Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature