On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 08:17:04PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:24:36 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > > * Package name : starlet > > Version : 0.16 > > Upstream Author : Kazuho Oku <kazuho...@gmail.com> > > * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Starlet/ > > * License : Perl > > Programming Lang: Perl > > Description : a simple, high-performance PSGI/Plack HTTP server > > [dh-make-perl] > > Needs the following modules for which there are no debian packages > available: > - Server::Starter > - Parallel::Prefork > > Server::Starter: > > Needs the following modules for which there are no debian packages > available: > - Proc::Wait3 > > Parallel::Prefork: > > Needs the following modules for which there are no debian packages > available: > - Proc::Wait3 > - Class::Accessor::Lite > > > So if someone is in packaging mood or needs some practice ... :)
These are now available, so I am going to package this. However I wanted to check whether starlet was really the right name. I picked this to be similar to starman, but there is a difference: there is no starlet command; it needs to be run using start_server or similar. Notably, start_server is actually provided by libserver-starter-perl (not server-starter). Starlet is a PSGI application, but the pkg-perl policy doesn't make any reference to this type of package for naming, so it could arguably be treated as either when it comes to naming. Any ideas? Dominic. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130106130904.gw5...@urchin.earth.li