On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 03:13:58PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > On dom, gen 06, 2013 at 01:09:04 +0000, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 08:17:04PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > > > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:24:36 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > > > > > > * Package name : starlet > > > > Version : 0.16 > > > > Upstream Author : Kazuho Oku <kazuho...@gmail.com> > > > > * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Starlet/ > > > > * License : Perl > > > > Programming Lang: Perl > > > > Description : a simple, high-performance PSGI/Plack HTTP server > > > > > > [dh-make-perl] > > > > > > Needs the following modules for which there are no debian packages > > > available: > > > - Server::Starter > > > - Parallel::Prefork > > > > > > Server::Starter: > > > > > > Needs the following modules for which there are no debian packages > > > available: > > > - Proc::Wait3 > > > > > > Parallel::Prefork: > > > > > > Needs the following modules for which there are no debian packages > > > available: > > > - Proc::Wait3 > > > - Class::Accessor::Lite > > > > > > > > > So if someone is in packaging mood or needs some practice ... :) > > > > These are now available, so I am going to package this. However I wanted > > to check whether starlet was really the right name. I picked this to be > > similar to starman, but there is a difference: there is no starlet command; > > it needs to be run using start_server or similar. Notably, start_server > > is actually provided by libserver-starter-perl (not server-starter). > > > > Starlet is a PSGI application, but the pkg-perl policy doesn't make > > any reference to this type of package for naming, so it could arguably > > be treated as either when it comes to naming. > > > > Any ideas? > > AFAICT the start_server script is not mandatory to use starlet, so you may > include a wrapper script that uses Plack::Runner with the "server => > 'Starlet'" > option. Such script could in turn be called by start_server if needed. That's > what starman does anyway [0].
Yes, but I'm not sure there's any need to do that. I was more musing on the definition of an application really. However I suppose your observation does support using the application-style name 'starlet'. Starlet does pull in Server::Starter as a dependency, so that's clearly how it's expected to be used. I think I'll go ahead with an upload with the name 'starlet' unless I hear to the contrary soon. Thanks for the feedback :) Dominic. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130106165151.ga5...@urchin.earth.li