Le 20/01/2013 06:20, Vasudev Kamath a écrit : > On 22:00 Mon 14 Jan , Raphael Hertzog wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Vasudev Kamath wrote: >>> I did some more investigation and I don't see any file name clash >>> betweek zim from zim-wiki and zimlib. Even though both packages have zim >>> in the package name there is description field which clarifies any >>> confusion between both packages for end user. >>> >>> So I guess renaming from upstream is not required. Please share your >>> thoughts. >> >> My thoughts are "I have been confused and thus I believe that other users >> will be confused in the future". This is why I believe it's best to >> rename. Furthermore, there are no file clashes yet, but the day >> where someone will write a python wrapper for "zimlib" (and this is >> on the roadmap apparently), it might become a real issue. > > OK thanks for sharing your views on this, apparently I didn't think of > python wrapper for zimlib. > > @Kelson can you share your views on this.
What about "libopenzim" as package name, content unchanged? Emmanuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50fbb3ef.7060...@kiwix.org
