On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 09:39 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Is your reasoning here that renaming would be additional work and you > don't want to impose that work on downstreams?
Basically yes. I don't really consider a name change to be imposing on downstreams, though, as I don't expect downstreams that have already packaged it would change their package names. But it is definitely an annoyance. I don't think putting gtk3 in the name is a great idea, since libgames- support will probably switch to GTK+ 4 eventually. Michael