Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name    : r-noncran-design
>   Version         : 1.1.6
>   Upstream Author : Frank Harrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL             : http://hesweb1.med.virginia.edu/biostat/rms
> * License         : GPL
>   Description     : Regression modeling strategies
>
> Design is one of two packages by Frank Harrell and requires the other, Hmisc.
> Design provides the code supporting Harrell's 2002 book on 'Regression
> Modeling Strategies'.  I intend to stick with the convention of calling the
> (Debian) source package the same as the (source) R package -- design -- but
> then normalizing on r-noncran-design as done by prior packages maintained by
> Chris Lawrence and myself.
>
I think that 'design' is, also as a source package name, way too
generic. You can't in any way defer what this source package is
about... The same applies (but not as much) to hmisc, IMHO. Why not
name the source packages the same as the binary packages?

Regards, Andy
-- 
Andreas Rottmann         | [EMAIL PROTECTED]      | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint              | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219  F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62

Packages should build-depend on what they should build-depend.

Reply via email to