Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > > * Package name : r-noncran-design > Version : 1.1.6 > Upstream Author : Frank Harrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://hesweb1.med.virginia.edu/biostat/rms > * License : GPL > Description : Regression modeling strategies > > Design is one of two packages by Frank Harrell and requires the other, Hmisc. > Design provides the code supporting Harrell's 2002 book on 'Regression > Modeling Strategies'. I intend to stick with the convention of calling the > (Debian) source package the same as the (source) R package -- design -- but > then normalizing on r-noncran-design as done by prior packages maintained by > Chris Lawrence and myself. > I think that 'design' is, also as a source package name, way too generic. You can't in any way defer what this source package is about... The same applies (but not as much) to hmisc, IMHO. Why not name the source packages the same as the binary packages?
Regards, Andy -- Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62 Packages should build-depend on what they should build-depend.