On 04/05/26 07:01, [email protected] wrote:
The Debian NEW review of fingwit 1.0.8+ds-1 has been completed.

Decision: REJECTED
Reviewer: Reinhard Tartler

Review comment:

Thanks for your diligence while working on this package. I've had a
look through the source, and while it's mostly there, I have to reject
it for now because of a few issues in the copyright and control files.

The `Files: *` stanza in `debian/copyright` contains a typo at the end
of the `Copyright` field: `2021-2026 Linux Mint
<[email protected]>t:`. Also, the full license text provided for
`GPL-3` is actually the boilerplate for GPL-2 or later. Since the
package is claimed as GPL-3 and the `LICENSE` file is GPL-3, you should
use the correct GPL-3 boilerplate or simply refer to the common license
file.

Furthermore, the `Source` stanza in `debian/control` is missing the
`Priority` field (it should be `optional`), and the `Section` should
probably be `admin` or `utils` instead of `misc`. Finally, there is a
trailing space in the `po/*` stanza of `debian/copyright`, and the
description for `libpam-fingwit` has inconsistent indentation for its
bullet points.

-rt

Full review details: https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/reviews/fingwit

I've addressed the remarks in the review and pushed the changes to Salsa [1] and also uploaded to mentors [2]

Can you please upload it?

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/spaciouskarter78/fingwit/-/commit/b78f676598dd5d401eb39a55df04501ce5bb0912

[2] https://mentors.debian.net/package/fingwit/

--
Regards,

Aryan Karamtoth,
Debian Maintainer

"Sic Parvis Magna" - Sir Francis Drake

Homepage: https://spaceports.in

IRC: spaciouskarter78
Matrix: @spaciouskarter78:matrix.debian.social

GPG Fingerprint: 7A7D 9308 2BD1 9BAF A83B 7E34 FE90 07B8 ED64 0421

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xFE9007B8ED640421.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to