On 04/05/26 07:01, [email protected] wrote:
The Debian NEW review of fingwit 1.0.8+ds-1 has been completed.Decision: REJECTED Reviewer: Reinhard Tartler Review comment: Thanks for your diligence while working on this package. I've had a look through the source, and while it's mostly there, I have to reject it for now because of a few issues in the copyright and control files. The `Files: *` stanza in `debian/copyright` contains a typo at the end of the `Copyright` field: `2021-2026 Linux Mint <[email protected]>t:`. Also, the full license text provided for `GPL-3` is actually the boilerplate for GPL-2 or later. Since the package is claimed as GPL-3 and the `LICENSE` file is GPL-3, you should use the correct GPL-3 boilerplate or simply refer to the common license file. Furthermore, the `Source` stanza in `debian/control` is missing the `Priority` field (it should be `optional`), and the `Section` should probably be `admin` or `utils` instead of `misc`. Finally, there is a trailing space in the `po/*` stanza of `debian/copyright`, and the description for `libpam-fingwit` has inconsistent indentation for its bullet points. -rt Full review details: https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/reviews/fingwit
Hi Reinhard Wasn't priority field made non mandatory since Debian Policy version 4.7.3? [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2025/12/msg00005.html -- Regards, Aryan Karamtoth, Debian Maintainer "Sic Parvis Magna" - Sir Francis Drake Homepage: https://spaceports.in IRC: spaciouskarter78 Matrix: @spaciouskarter78:matrix.debian.social GPG Fingerprint: 7A7D 9308 2BD1 9BAF A83B 7E34 FE90 07B8 ED64 0421
OpenPGP_0xFE9007B8ED640421.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
