On Saturday 20 September 2008 07:24:22 Johannes Berg wrote: > On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 07:03 +1000, Kel Modderman wrote: > > > Yep. I think either /usr/bin or /bin is most appropriate, but I just have > > this > > feeling that someone will want their wifi to get /usr/ mounted sometime > > (this > > is Debian, they want to do this crazy stuff all the time), which means that > > using /bin now would cause less headaches in the future (when everyones > > scripts > > are using absolute paths to /usr/bin/iw already...). > > It's pathogenic, and I'd suggest to put iw into the initramfs ;) > > > If that is a realistic scenario, it would leave the choice of the Debian iw > > maintainer to a) say that use case is not possible, and stick to his guns, > > or > > b) move iw to /bin and thus possibly diverge from what the rest of the > > distro's, and you as upstream, are doing. > > Doesn't that depend on libnl upstream again? That installs to /usr/lib > by default, so I don't think I should install to /bin as iw upstream. > I'd be willing to change but it seems that it depends on libnl upstream > changing too?
For it to be an effective change, yep, it would depend on that. Thanks, Kel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]