On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 04:35:10PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 10:12:47PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:05:45PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 09:33:06AM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System > > > wrote: > > > > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > > > # http://www.debian.org/Bugs/ should gain a couple of rows of > > > > > checkboxes > > > > > # to allow including/excluding by tags. See #141968 for instructions. > > > > > > The problem with this is that bugreport.cgi seems not to handle > > > more than one &include (or &exclude) right. It only uses the last > > > occurence (This is an other behavior as for sev-inc and similar). > > > You must specify them as &include=patch,wontfix f.e. > > > But this is not possible with HTML forms, neither with checkboxes nor > > > lists (<select> with "multiple"). Or does anyone know a way? > > > > I see. I'll have a look at fixing that tonight. > > Fixed (somewhat belatedly, sorry). I've prepared and tested the > following patch to webwml; does it look OK, and may I commit it? I've > used a separate "tag-" namespace for the translated tag names because I > wasn't sure if it was a good idea to have them colliding with statuses; > on the other hand the "pending" and "fixed" statuses just mean that the > respective tags are set, so I could be persuaded otherwise ...
Aren't gettext tags merged anyway in the po file when they contain the same text? Frank -- *** Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *** *** http://www.djpig.de/ *** see also: - http://www.usta.de/ - http://fachschaft.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de/