On Wed, 30 May 2007 18:23:44 -0700, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, 30 May 2007, Josip Rodin wrote:
>> It's unlikely that our web pages have much content for which there
>> isn't prior art, or simply common knowledge.
> Prior art isn't an issue, since it's not patented.
> In any event, to resolve this issue completely all that we need is 1)
> a GPG signed email from every contributor saying that they either
> assign copyright of their contributions to SPI or give SPI a
> non-exclusive royalte-free license to do with the copyright work as
> they see fit 2) a directive from the DPL to SPI to license the work
> under GPL (or MIT/Expat or whatever -www decides.)
I am willing to relicense my contributions under the GPL v2; but
I am not willing to assign my copyright away.
I specifically do not trust the SPI enough to allow them to
relicense my work in the future.
If SPI wants to discuss work-for-hire agreements, they can mail
me off list.
manoj
--
Microbiology Lab: Staph Only!
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
