* Francesco P. Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-06 12:16:34 CEST]: > On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 11:58:07AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 03.10.2008, 14:43 -0600 schrieb CVS User frankie: > > > - <dt><a > > > href="$(DOC)/developers-reference/resources#s-incoming-system">\ > > > + <dt><a > > > href="$(DOC)/developers-reference/resources.html#incoming-system">\ > > > > Erm, pardon? Why did you change that link? It was completely valid, > > what was the problem with that? > > It is now pointing to sec 4.8 (incoming system), before that it was pointing > to the > beginning of chapter 4 (resources) because that tag did not exist.
Ah, right - only noticed the addition of the .html (which might work against content negotiation, but I checked, it's done with .html.fr in there so it's fine ...) but didn't see the change to stripp off the s- from the anchor. Still wonder, do we need (or rather, want) the additional .html in here? Is it needed? Might it influence future content negotiation changes? Propably not, but I think it's common that we only link to the short name without any extensions here. So long, and thanks for fast response. :) Rhonda -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]