On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 04:59:35PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote: > The Romanian team has worked to update the release-notes for both > lenny and etch. Now is clear to me/us that there are 2 sets of release > notes: > > - one for etch > - one for lenny > > Since we are a small team, we are mostly interested in the lenny release > notes. > > We know that there are some encoding issues for the *etch* release > notes if compiled on etch.
Note that it is enough to recode to latin2 at po4a level or po level in order to solve that (explained on the list). > Also, there are some problems compiling lenny's release notes on etch > (packages missing which need to be backported). >From etch-backports: dblatex and xmlroff > What is not clear: > - Should lenny's release notes be compilable on etch? Yes, because www-master is running etch. > - On which distro will lenny's release notes be built? Etch or Lenny? Etch as long as www-master is runnning etch. -- Simon Paillard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
