You are one of the most hysterically panicky people I have ever met. First of all, I cannot understand why you CC'ed Stephen Moraco in your message, since he doesn't, AIUI, have much to do with your concerns.
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 11:05:49AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > mesa James Treacy I talked to him; because of GGI and > > stuff, > > Mesa will continue to be maintained > > independently of X, however X will provide > > its own Mesa/GL implementation in xlibgl1 > > (which will provide libgl1) and xlibgl-dev > > huh ??? > > will ggi-mesa and x-mesa be able to be installed simoultanouesly or will they > conflict ? Well, they'll probably have to confict. When two packages both provide the same virtual package, that's typically what you get. Especially in this case, as both packages will have to install a thing called /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2. > i don't know, but it seems to me that accelerated mesa for X as well as the > remaining DRI stuff is one of the most advertissed part of the XF4 release > (well together with the proprietary binary drivers from nvidia and the like, > how do you plan to manage those, branden ?) Well, I'm sure I'll figure something out, Sven. Instead of freaking out, either calm down and contribute, or be quiet. -- G. Branden Robinson | Somebody once asked me if I thought sex Debian GNU/Linux | was dirty. I said, "It is if you're [EMAIL PROTECTED] | doing it right." http://www.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Woody Allen
pgpqeCZ4Fzzmq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
