On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 06:09:35PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
>       * drop xlibmesa-glu* in favour of libglu1-mesa*
>       * fix xlibmesa-drm-src name; the DRM isn't a library, and it has
>         nothing whatsoever to do with Mesa. Something like
>         drm-module-src maybe?
>       * xlibmesa-gl{,-dev,-dbg} is already better than xlibmesa4-gl*,
>         thanks. Does anything speak against xlibmesa-gl{1,-dev,-dbg} (1
>         being the OpenGL API/ABI version) though, which would be
>         consistent with my current dri-trunk packages?

Err, why would we have xlibmesa-gl1 and libglu1-mesa? That's woefully
inconsistent - I thought the whole point of this was consistency, no?

-- 
Daniel Stone                                     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne

Attachment: pgpfleTRQ6Xcs.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to