On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 13:35, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 01:27:33PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote: > > On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 12:54, Daniel Stone wrote: > > > > Any ideas on what we should call xlibmesa-drm-src and xlibmesa-gl? > > > > Time for a little brainstorming session? :) > > > > drm-xfree86-module-src ? (I don't really like drm-trunk-module-src etc. > > either though, so if anybody has a better idea... :) > > > > I can live with xlibmesa-gl, though I like xlibmesa-gl1 better. Another > > random idea would be libgl1-xfree86 . > > Mmm, I'm liking libgl1-xfree86. My original name for the DRM sources was > xfree86-drm-src, but that later got renamed.
Not too bad, methinks. > How are the other GL packages named - mesa-libgl1 and friends? No, as has been discussed here, it's still mesag3 for hysterical reasons. We have to set a good example. :) > If so, why not xfree86-libgl1? I like libgl1-xfree86 better because the emphasis is on libgl1. OTOH xlibmesa-gl(1) have the advantage that xlibmesa-gl-dev can stay the same, allowing for a smoother transition. Also, is there a naming scheme yet for the other libraries to be split out of xlibs, which might be applicable here? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer