On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 04:35, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: > >>>>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I object to killing off the X-forked GLU package at this point for that > >> reason > >> and others. > > I think there are three points of issue related it. > > > 1) We will ship libGLU or not? > > Perhaps, YES. > I agree your point, currenlty We can not disable libGLU > cleanly (described one more problem on 2).
Assuming 2) is solved, are there other reasons we can't disable it cleanly? I'm honestly curious. > 2) Build without BuildGLULibrary is not easy. > > Even if we decide libGLU will not ship, we need some more changes > to solve problems > > After my roughly review, another problem is found, > glxinfo will be built disabling GLU support without > libGLULibrary. So, current branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/ settings > does break glxinfo compatibility between previous release. Does this require more changes than build-depending on libglu-dev (and possibly some config/cf/ fiddling)? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer