On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 19:01, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 10:12:44PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 20:40, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > IMO it's stupid to ship glu.h if we're not going to ship the rest of the > > > library. > > > > This change doesn't ship it though, does it? > > Not in the package, but the fact that the upstream install rules think > it's getting shipped smacks of cognitive dissonance.
Upstream is broken, it installs all GL/ headers if BuildGlxExt || BuildGLXLibrary is true. > > > (Why can't XFree86 Build-Depend on libglu1-mesa-dev?) > > > > Actually, I think it'd have to Build-Depend on libglu-dev for glxinfo. > > Shouldn't those be the same thing, once GLU is killed off from XFree86's > own tree? I meant to stress the need, and that it could be any package providing libglu-dev, should there ever be a reasonable alternative. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer