On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 05:05:04PM +0200, peppe wrote: > The point is: why xlibs-data and glibc use the same env > vars but interpret them differently? That is: why must I set > LANG="en_US.ISO-8859-15" for libc and LANG="en_US.ISO8859-15" for > xlibs-data? (Notice the subtle difference, and the impossibility)
Because Xlib's locale handling was implemented before many C libraries supported locales at all. I am still stumped as to why you think the lanuage and territory part of the LC_CTYPE variable are significant. -- G. Branden Robinson | Mob rule isn't any prettier just Debian GNU/Linux | because you call your mob a [EMAIL PROTECTED] | government. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
