Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:22:06 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#266074: xlibs-dev: dependency problem with several other X
library packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Aug 2004 16:12:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 16 09:12:45 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pd9516c4a.dip.t-dialin.net (mongoose.ized.com) [217.81.108.74]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bwk6G-00079K-00; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:12:45 -0700
Received: (qmail 14686 invoked by uid 11); 16 Aug 2004 16:12:12 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dan Chiavelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xlibs-dev: dependency problem with several other X library packages
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:12:12 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xlibs-dev
Severity: important
I think the dependencies have gotten messed up for xlibs-dev... all of
the dependent packages are off by one minor version number. Please
pardon the copious output, but it describes the problem much better than
I can:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] apt-get install xlibs-dev
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
xlibs-dev: Depends: libice-dev but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libsm-dev but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libx11-dev but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libxext-dev but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libxi-dev but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libxmu-dev but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libxmuu-dev but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libxp-dev but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libxpm-dev but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libxrandr-dev but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libxt-dev but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libxtrap-dev but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libxtst-dev but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libxv-dev but it is not going to be installed
Depends: xlibs-static-dev but it is not going to be
installed
E: Broken packages
[EMAIL PROTECTED] apt-get install libice-dev libsm-dev libx11-dev
libxext-dev libxi-dev libxmu-dev libxmuu-dev libxp-dev libxpm-dev
libxrandr-dev libxt-dev libxtrap-dev libxtst-dev libxv-dev
xlibs-static-dev
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libice-dev: Depends: libice6 (= 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4) but 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 is
to be installed
libsm-dev: Depends: libsm6 (= 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4) but 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 is to
be installed
libx11-dev: Depends: libx11-6 (= 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4) but 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 is
to be installed
libxext-dev: Depends: libxext6 (= 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4) but 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
is to be installed
libxi-dev: Depends: libxi6 (= 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4) but 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 is to
be installed
libxmu-dev: Depends: libxmu6 (= 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4) but 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 is
to be installed
libxmuu-dev: Depends: libxmuu1 (= 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4) but 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
is to be installed
libxp-dev: Depends: libxp6 (= 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4) but 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 is to
be installed
libxpm-dev: Depends: libxpm4 (= 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4)
libxrandr-dev: Depends: libxrandr2 (= 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4) but
4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 is to be installed
libxt-dev: Depends: libxt6 (= 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4) but 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 is to
be installed
libxtrap-dev: Depends: libxtrap6 (= 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4) but 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
is to be installed
libxtst-dev: Depends: libxtst6 (= 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4) but 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
is to be installed
libxv-dev: Depends: libxv1 (= 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4) but 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5 is to
be installed
E: Broken packages
Thanks for your attention...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8.1
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 266074-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Aug 2004 20:22:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 25 13:22:08 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (sisyphus.deadbeast.net)
[65.26.182.85]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C04HY-0003qi-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:22:08 -0700
Received: by sisyphus.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0723F68C015; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:22:06 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:22:06 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#266074: xlibs-dev: dependency problem with several other X
library packages
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040803i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
--C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
tag 266074 - moreinfo
thanks
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 09:36:28PM +0200, Dan Chiavelli wrote:
> Hello,
>=20
> Thank you for your attention. I think this bug should be closed; in=20
> trying to solve this problem today, out of desperation I force-installed=
=20
> the dependent packages listed below by manually downloading version=20
> 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4, and in doing so I saw that these versions were the=20
> normal, standard ones for sarge, not 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5. I can only assume=
=20
> I somehow got sid packages for these libs in the recent past (I can't=20
> imagine how; perhaps I modified the wrong line in my sources.list).
>=20
> So: very sorry for the bad bug report. Everything works with the=20
> "older" packages.
Thanks for following up! I'm sorry you ran into difficulty but glad you
have resolved the problem.
Closing as due to package version skew on user's system.
--=20
G. Branden Robinson | I'm not going to waste my precious
Debian GNU/Linux | flash memory with Perl when I can
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | do so much more with it.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Joey Hess
--C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iEUEARECAAYFAkEs9O4ACgkQ6kxmHytGonzYDgCWNc6an94JMl0r5ZYWjv+wJnnk
FgCfYqe6My9H+tLoBHghZAs1fqXoFh0=
=gzYB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc--
