Hi, first, I've attached the patch with the tags langdevel::c-sharp and devel::arch:cli. If the patch is fine with all of you, I would commit it to the vocabulary.
I was wondering what the rationale of langdevel::xyz is, if devel::arch:abc is introduced. Why is langdevel not included into devel? Right now, it's inconsistent with made-of, where the languages are tagged as lang:abc, so why not having devel::lang:abc? Neither devel nor langdevel are very big, so inclusion would be possible, and the tag names do only increase by one character (the extra colon between "lang" and the name). BTW: Is there any documentation about what the "nature" descriptions to the facets mean? greetings Torsten -- Torsten Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ID: A244C858 -- FP: 1902 0002 5DFC 856B F146 894C 7CC5 451E A244 C858 Keyserver: subkeys.pgp.net
Index: debian-packages =================================================================== --- debian-packages (Revision 1472) +++ debian-packages (Arbeitskopie) @@ -263,6 +263,10 @@ Nature: energy Description: Software development / programming +Tag: devel::arch:cli +Implies: devel +Description: Tools and libraries for development with .NET + Tag: devel::bugtracker Implies: devel Description: Bug tracking tools @@ -752,6 +756,9 @@ Tag: langdevel::c++ Description: C++ Development +Tag: langdevel::c-sharp +Description: C# Development + Tag: langdevel::fortran Description: Fortran Development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Debtags-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debtags-devel
