On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:23:58PM +0100, Torsten Marek wrote: > first, I've attached the patch with the tags langdevel::c-sharp and > devel::arch:cli. If the patch is fine with all of you, I would commit it to > the > vocabulary.
I'll comment here in the next thread, so the discussion is left together. > I was wondering what the rationale of langdevel::xyz is, if devel::arch:abc is > introduced. Why is langdevel not included into devel? Right now, it's > inconsistent with made-of, where the languages are tagged as lang:abc, so why > not having devel::lang:abc? Neither devel nor langdevel are very big, so > inclusion would be possible, and the tag names do only increase by one > character > (the extra colon between "lang" and the name). Reading this I had a closer look and yes, the two categories aren't too big. If noone has arguments against the merge, I could go on and do it. > BTW: Is there any documentation about what the "nature" descriptions to the > facets mean? Not explicitly, but there's a description here: http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/paper-debtags.html#faceted-classification Those fields were an experiment I did: I added them to see if they made any sense and if they would be any useful. One hope I had is that they could have been useful to group facets in an interface. However they don't seem to be that meaningful or useful, so we could probably just delete them. Ciao, Enrico -- GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Debtags-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debtags-devel
