Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 20:10:17 -0400 <002601c147b1$91f87fd0$f4a81f41@taugher> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:14:59 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [216.54.240.113] X-Declude-Spoolname: Dc154230.SMD X-Note: This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude (www.declude.com) X-NRecips: 1 X-Reverse-IP: mail.alliance1.org. Precedence: bulk Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [216.54.240.113] X-Declude-Spoolname: Dc736230.LST X-Note: This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude (www.declude.com) Organization: Computerized Horizons
What's with this sort of messaging? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jack Taugher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 7:10 PM > de.com> > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 99% CPU NOT the case with v1.26-interimB > Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:07:23 -0500 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > X-Priority: 3 > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 > X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [216.54.240.113] > X-Declude-Spoolname: Dbf320c8.SMD > X-Note: This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude (www.declude.com) > X-NRecips: 1 > X-Reverse-IP: mail.alliance1.org. > Precedence: bulk > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [216.54.240.113] > X-Declude-Spoolname: D865e0c8.LST > X-Note: This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude (www.declude.com) > Organization: Computerized Horizons > > Scott, > > We have not had any problems yet with v1.26-interimB. We had problems with > v1.25a, and same when we backgraded to v1.24. This seems to have fixed it. > We hadn't been able to more than 8-12 hours without a crash on v1.25a -- and > it's been about 30 hours since I installed v1.26-interimB. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude crashing and taking up 99% CPU > > > > That may actually be good news, combined with not having any reports > > yet of the interim release doing this (although it is too early to tell if > the > > interim release fixes the problem, since it can't be reproduced on > > demand). > > --- > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web > site at http://www.declude.com . > --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web site at http://www.declude.com .
