> The habeas test type should only be used if you have a specific reason to > do so (such as to automatically forward violations of the Habeas headers).
Thank you, Scott. This is exactly what I had in mind -- to lower Habeas weights sufficiently to reduce false positives while also catching Habeas abuse. Do I have this right? Remove default "WHITELIST HABEAS" Add "HABEAS habeas x x -20 0" to reduce false positives Add "HABEAS WARN" to catch Habeas abusers (when weight is still high) In mail client, filter on X-RBL-WARNING contains HABEAS and X-RBL-WARNING contains WEIGHT10 Thanks again. Dave -- David M. Delbridge President & CEO Circa 3000 ColdFusion Hosting http://www.circa3k.com 775-832-2445 --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
