Thats interesting, I upgraded both of the problem servers to 1.70 two days (about 36 
hours) before this hit.  I'm going to see if I can switch back to 1.69iX to see if 
there is a difference.

Dan


On Wednesday, June 4, 2003 14:50, Frederick Samarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have noticed that using the v1.65 I never see Declude use more the 45%
>CPU.
>
>Using 1.70 Beta I see Declude Max the CPU's 100%
>
>Has anyone else seen the same.
>
>Fred
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:36 PM
>Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Processes & Server Load
>
>
>>
>> >Assuming we're all talking about the same thing, Declude continues to run
>> >as a process waiting for replies from IP4r requests but does not consume
>> >much CPU time while doing so.
>>
>> That is correct.  It should use very, very little CPU time while waiting
>> for the results to come back.
>>
>> >Does pulling out IP4r tests during an episode show a immidiate decline in
>> >CPU use?
>>
>> It shouldn't cause a noticeable decline in CPU use -- I can't explain
>> Kami's results.
>>
>> >Does anyone know how the people hosting the IP4r tests feel about us
>> >slamming them with queries?
>>
>> You're not.  Specifically, they will see the same number of queries
>whether
>> you are running IMail v8's anti-spam, Declude JunkMail's, or some other
>> anti-spam solution.
>>
>> The reason for this is that your local DNS server will cache the results.
>>
>> >Suppose I'm cruising along with 20,000 queries a day, then jump to
>500,000
>> >over a few weeks, surely that makes an impression somewhere?  Is there a
>> >point were we should ask about doing more?
>>
>> There are some spam databases that request that heavy users (typically
>> 100,000+ E-mails/day) do zone transfers (downloading the DNS data a couple
>> times a day).
>>
>> However, if 80% of the lookups are cached, you're talking about 20,000
>> queries hitting the spam database for every 100,000 E-mails.  The root DNS
>> servers are able to handle up to tens of thousands of queries every
>second;
>> DNS is very efficient.
>>
>>                                                     -Scott
>> ---
>> Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
>> Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver
>> vulnerability detection.
>> Find out what you have been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.
>>
>> ---
>> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
>(http://www.declude.com)]
>>
>> ---
>> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
>> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
>> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
>> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>>
>
>---
>[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
>(http://www.declude.com)]
>
>---
>This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
>unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
>type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
>at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to