Hello David, Friday, December 5, 2003, 11:44:41 AM, you wrote:
DS> 3. Anyone see any problems with this scenario? Ok, I'll answer my own question. In thinking about this more, this isn't going to work. If I recode my rule base to return a 1 instead of 0 on whitelist, then the original sniffer test will interpret the 1 as a spam, then the externalplus test will interpret the 1 as whitelist and override the sniffer external test. So, I still lose the original reason for sniffer failure since sniffer will always be returning a 1, right? -- Best regards, David mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
