Is it possibble to set an iprange in IFBYPASS ? So that all 128 ips are set there ? Instead og using all the entrys for this ?
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Kulman > Sent: 6. desember 2003 09:49 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDER > didn't work for me me > > IPBYPASS is great except for the 20 entry limitation. ATT, > where many of my clients and myself have mailboxes that > forward to my IMail server has 23 mail forwarders. Then add > in the secondary MX's, etc. and I have to use multiple hops. > > BTW, how do you intend to do "selective use of multiple hop scanning"? > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew > > Bramble > > Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 11:34 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDER didn't > > work for me me > > > > > > That's why you should name it BONDEDSENDER-DYNA and why it doesn't > > matter on my system. > > > > The trick here is that Declude will skip over the DNS-based > tests on > > anything beyond the first hop if the name has DUL or DYNA in it. > > Someone else is using CBL-DYNA in order to keep that test from > > throwing FP's when the originating computer's IP address is on the > > list, but used a legit mail server to send the E-mail (instead of > > direct delivery which is the real issue). > > > > Scanning multiple hops seems to be mostly useful in places where > > E-mail is being forwarded, which only exposes the legit forwarding > > machine. It would be great if there was some other way to identify > > when a message has been forwarded at the server level, and skip the > > last hop when that happenes. I kind of doubt that this would be > > possible. In the mean-time, I am going to try IPBYPASSing the mail > > servers that are known to be forwarding to my server which > should have > > the same effect as a selective use of multiple hop scanning. > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > George Kulman wrote: > > > > >Matt, > > > > > >I do scan multiple hops. > > > > > >George > > > > > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew > > >>Bramble > > >>Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 7:14 PM > > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time > BONDEDSENDER didn't > > >>work for me me > > >> > > >> > > >>George, > > >> > > >>The suggestion by Andrew to rename the test > BONDEDSENDER-DYNA would > > >>definitely prevent it from scanning prior hops. I find > this test to > > >>be useful as it is IP based and helps some very important E-mail > > >>that tends to have issues with several major RBL's. I haven't > > >>started to scan on multiple hops yet, so this doesn't come into > > >>play. > > >> > > >>Matt > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>George Kulman wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>>Rob, > > >>> > > >>>Your backup and gateways should have IPBYPASS entries in the > > >>> > > >>> > > >>GLOBAL.CFG. > > >> > > >> > > >>>The BONDEDSENDER should be the originating Server and that > > >>> > > >>> > > >>should be what's > > >> > > >> > > >>>used for this test. > > >>> > > >>>I discontinued use within a few days since was letting spam > > >>> > > >>> > > >>through with it > > >> > > >> > > >>>and there were other ways to handle the valid mail. > > >>> > > >>>George > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>>-----Original Message----- > > >>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert > > >>>>Grosshandler > > >>>>Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 6:38 PM > > >>>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>>>Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time > BONDEDSENDER didn't > > >>>>work for me me > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>Negative weights on last hop only? > > >>>> > > >>>>How would that affect a gateway (or e-mail that goes to a > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>backup mail > > >> > > >> > > >>>>server)? > > >>>> > > >>>>Rob > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > > > > > --- > > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > (http://www.declude.com)] > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > --- > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > (http://www.declude.com)] > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.