My understanding is that CIDR ranges are not supported by IPBYPASS and I wouldn't want the whole Class C, just the part I need.
I'm going to start a new thread on the IPBYPASS situation. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > ISPHuset Nordic > Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 10:54 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDER > didn't work for me me > > > Is it possibble to set an iprange in IFBYPASS ? > > So that all 128 ips are set there ? Instead og using all the > entrys for this ? > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > George Kulman > > Sent: 6. desember 2003 09:49 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDER > > didn't work for me me > > > > IPBYPASS is great except for the 20 entry limitation. ATT, > > where many of my clients and myself have mailboxes that > > forward to my IMail server has 23 mail forwarders. Then add > > in the secondary MX's, etc. and I have to use multiple hops. > > > > BTW, how do you intend to do "selective use of multiple hop > scanning"? > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew > > > Bramble > > > Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 11:34 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time > BONDEDSENDER didn't > > > work for me me > > > > > > > > > That's why you should name it BONDEDSENDER-DYNA and why > it doesn't > > > matter on my system. > > > > > > The trick here is that Declude will skip over the DNS-based > > tests on > > > anything beyond the first hop if the name has DUL or DYNA in it. > > > Someone else is using CBL-DYNA in order to keep that test from > > > throwing FP's when the originating computer's IP address > is on the > > > list, but used a legit mail server to send the E-mail (instead of > > > direct delivery which is the real issue). > > > > > > Scanning multiple hops seems to be mostly useful in places where > > > E-mail is being forwarded, which only exposes the legit > forwarding > > > machine. It would be great if there was some other way > to identify > > > when a message has been forwarded at the server level, > and skip the > > > last hop when that happenes. I kind of doubt that this would be > > > possible. In the mean-time, I am going to try > IPBYPASSing the mail > > > servers that are known to be forwarding to my server which > > should have > > > the same effect as a selective use of multiple hop scanning. > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > > > George Kulman wrote: > > > > > > >Matt, > > > > > > > >I do scan multiple hops. > > > > > > > >George > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > > > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Matthew > > > >>Bramble > > > >>Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 7:14 PM > > > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time > > BONDEDSENDER didn't > > > >>work for me me > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>George, > > > >> > > > >>The suggestion by Andrew to rename the test > > BONDEDSENDER-DYNA would > > > >>definitely prevent it from scanning prior hops. I find > > this test to > > > >>be useful as it is IP based and helps some very > important E-mail > > > >>that tends to have issues with several major RBL's. I haven't > > > >>started to scan on multiple hops yet, so this doesn't come into > > > >>play. > > > >> > > > >>Matt > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>George Kulman wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>>Rob, > > > >>> > > > >>>Your backup and gateways should have IPBYPASS entries in the > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>GLOBAL.CFG. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>>The BONDEDSENDER should be the originating Server and that > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>should be what's > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>>used for this test. > > > >>> > > > >>>I discontinued use within a few days since was letting spam > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>through with it > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>>and there were other ways to handle the valid mail. > > > >>> > > > >>>George > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>>>-----Original Message----- > > > >>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Robert > > > >>>>Grosshandler > > > >>>>Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 6:38 PM > > > >>>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>>>Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time > > BONDEDSENDER didn't > > > >>>>work for me me > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>>Negative weights on last hop only? > > > >>>> > > > >>>>How would that affect a gateway (or e-mail that goes to a > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>backup mail > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>>>server)? > > > >>>> > > > >>>>Rob > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > --- > > > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > > (http://www.declude.com)] > > > > --- > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > --- > > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > > (http://www.declude.com)] > > > > --- > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > > --- > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
