Hi
Scott:
I'm still trying to
come up with an "easy to implement" way to give us more control over
"conflicting" final actions. Specifically, I have several tests set to
"HOLD" or "DELETE" (in fact, the vast majority of incoming mail) -
however, a small number of them escaped detection by Sniffer or other
services, which have an interest in receiving a copy of such
mail.
At the moment, I
can't "ROUTETO" or "COPYTO" - because the HOLD/DELETE actions overrides those
features. On the other hand I can't just bombard these people with all my
received spam if they already detected 95% of that.
Therefore, how about
we allow a filter command to selectively reset pending action,
e.g.:
RESETACTION DELETE
RESETACTION HOLD
I could then modify
my filter that already determines if certain mail has accumulated a high weight
but has not been detected by Sniffert. That filter already hat has the "ROUTETO"
and "COPYTO" action - and inside the filter I can "reset" the "Delete"
and "Hold" actions, so that my "new" actions actually do get performed as
intended?
Best
Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent
Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20
(Business)
Fax: +1 201 934-9206
http://www.HM-Software.com/
