Hi Scott:
I'm still trying to come up with an "easy to implement" way to give us more
control over "conflicting" final actions. Specifically, I have several
tests set to "HOLD" or "DELETE" (in fact, the vast majority of incoming
mail) - however, a small number of them escaped detection by Sniffer or
other services, which have an interest in receiving a copy of such mail.
At the moment, I can't "ROUTETO" or "COPYTO" - because the HOLD/DELETE
actions overrides those features. On the other hand I can't just bombard
these people with all my received spam if they already detected 95% of that.
Therefore, how about we allow a filter command to selectively reset pending
action, e.g.:
RESETACTION DELETE
RESETACTION HOLD
I could then modify my filter that already determines if certain mail has
accumulated a high weight but has not been detected by Sniffer. That filter
already hat has the "ROUTETO" and "COPYTO" action - and inside the filter I
can "reset" the "Delete" and "Hold" actions, so that my "new" actions
actually do get performed as intended?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax: +1 201 934-9206
http://www.HM-Software.com/
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
