That was not the original. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox > Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2004 10:08 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SENDERDB ? > > Ok, so what should we be using now? The www.senderdb.com site still > references pub.senderdb.net...or was that not the original? > > Darin. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Tolmachoff (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2004 12:55 PM > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SENDERDB ? > > > What is the server name you are querying? The original one is no longer > valid. > > John Tolmachoff > Engineer/Consultant/Owner > eServices For You > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler > > Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2004 5:06 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SENDERDB ? > > > > > > Have I missed something or why pub.senderdb.net doesn't return any answers > > for ip4r-queries? > > >From 2004-09-01 on I can't see any results for SENDERDB. > > > > On a tipical workday (Monday 2004-08-30) there was the following results, > > based on 12407 processed messages (Spam: 6335 (51.1%) Legit: 6072 > (48.9%)) > > > > SENDERBD-BL > > => SS (correct) 25% > > => SH (wrong) 1% > > => no result 74% > > > > Assuming we would give this test a weight of 30% of the hold weight this > > would change the results in this manner: > > +0 ham messages hold as false positive > > +4 messages identified as spam > > +26 messages has a final result above 200% of the hold weight (so out of > our > > review range) > > > > The resting ~3000 SENDERDB-results was for messages already having a final > > weight above 200% of our hold weight > > > > So it would be a usefull test, if it would continue to answer for our > > queries. > > Anyone know something about the accesibilty of this DB? > > > > Markus > > > > > > --- > > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > (http://www.declude.com)] > > > > --- > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > --- > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > (http://www.declude.com)] > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > --- > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
