Hi,
I have a strange question, which once against my
astounding ignorance. I just tried using DLAnalyzer Lite on our latest
Declude JM log. For the sample I tested, I got these results:
Total Messages Processed: 11,234
Messages That Failed Defined Test(s): 10,153 Percentage That Failed Defined Test(s): 90.38% Average Message Weight: 4 Average Message Weight/Failed: 5 TEST #
FAILED
Percentage
WEIGHT10...........6,308.......56.15% CATCHALLMAILS......5,393.......48.01% NOLEGITCONTENT.....4,361.......38.82% IPNOTINMX..........4,237.......37.72% WEIGHT5............3,856.......34.32% WEIGHT10S..........3,564.......31.73% WEIGHT20...........3,509.......31.24% WEIGHT7............3,465.......30.84% SNIFFER............3,451.......30.72% SPAMCOP............3,006.......26.76% You can ignore the Weight tests; those are just
weight ranges and not real tests. Here's the thing: Catchallmails also is
not a real test; it's supposed to catch all emails. So why doesn't the
Catchallmails statistic above show 100%? The system is telling me that
Catchallmails only caught 48%.
I should mention that Catchallmails comes in the
global.cfg file after the regular tests, and after the weight ranges, but before
a handful of whitelisted IPs.
Help, please?
Ben
BC Web
|
Title: Message
- [Declude.JunkMail] catchallmails question Imail Admin
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] catchallmails que... Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] catchallmails... Imail Admin
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] catchallm... Imail Admin