Andy, Thanks for the information. There is no doubt that you could limit the processes and never reach this overloaded condition and that would mask the issue, and gateway validation should also prevent overloaded conditions if you were formerly being bombarded. What I'm curious about however is whether or not Declude corrected the issue (if it was theirs), or if they just simply masked it by allowing for these limits. Personally, I'm a little concerned about controlling things with a limit that is only associated with a process count since there are certainly many times on my box that it needs to handle bursty traffic and I don't want to back things up if I can help it. I already know that depending on whether or not something is whitelisted, has an attachment, or how big the attachment or body of the message is, my box will respond very differently. I would hate to put a limit on things that might cap my server at 50% utilization in some cases, but might be too high to matter in others. Thanks, Matt Andy Schmidt wrote:
-- ===================================================== MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro. http://www.mailpure.com/software/ ===================================================== |
Title: Message
- [Declude.JunkMail] Error 183 in Declude Virus... Matt
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Error 183 in Decl... Andy Schmidt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Error 183 in ... Matt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Error 183 in ... Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Error 183... Gufler Markus
- [Declude.JunkMail] Imail crashes aft... scott_powner
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail cra... Gufler Markus
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail... scott_powner
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ... Erik
- Re: [Declude.JunkMa... Matt
- RE: [Declude.Ju... Markus Gufler
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ... Matt