I hold at 20, bounce at 40, and delete at 60.
I realize bouncing is bad, but we’re government, so I have to be careful about outright deleting email without notifying someone, somewhere.
Karl Drugge
-----Original Message-----
What are you using for a hold weight and delete weight?
Brian
----- Original Message ----- Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 3:17 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address
I can confirm that.
If a single email address is white listed, then all of them get white listed.
The solution was a line like this : BYPASSWHITELIST bypasswhitelist 45 6 0 0
If an email was over weight 45, AND it also had 6 or more recipients, than it bypassed the white-listing and checked it normally.
I never tried to do it with individual config files.. But that might work, if it didn't affect all the recipients.
Karl Drugge
-----Original Message-----
I recall that happening with IMail as well. That is why I was wondering if I did something wrong before.
Brian
----- Original Message ----- From: Shayne Embry Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:12 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address
We
have found that if one of the addresses is whitelisted, then every recipient's
address gets whitelisted. This may be unique to SmarterMail/Declude. I don't
remember having the problem with IMail, but we haven't used it in over a year. Hi Brian,
Yes, this can be done with the Pro version. You can have per-user configurations. You can't not have Declude scan the mail, but you can set this individual's configuration to ignore all test results and deliver the mail. As far as I know, this shouldn't have any affect on other recipients of the email.
Dean On 1/17/06, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have a customer who wants to receive all emails
without having declude ---------- PLEASE NOTE : Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from City officials regarding City business are public records available to the public and media upon request. Your E-mail communications may be subject to public disclosure. PLEASE NOTE : Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from City officials regarding City business are public records available to the public and media upon request. Your E-mail communications may be subject to public disclosure. ---------- PLEASE NOTE : Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from City officials regarding City business are public records available to the public and media upon request. Your E-mail communications may be subject to public disclosure. PLEASE NOTE : Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from City officials regarding City business are public records available to the public and media upon request. Your E-mail communications may be subject to public disclosure.
|
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address
IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\) Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:05:17 -0800
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting emai... Brian
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting... IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting... IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelis... Matt
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whit... David Lewis-Waller
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting... IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelis... David Lewis-Waller
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelis... Matt
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelis... Jeff Cochran