/ignore From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Edmonds Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 10:36 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License Importance: High Hi Everyone on the Declude Junkmail Discussion
List,
I have to apologise for keeping up this thread, I dont
usually have the time to respond to such an extent but the personal insults and
flamings I am receiving after asking a simple question leaves me no choice but
respond.
I myself have a busy web design consultancy and hosting business as well as several portals to run so my time is precious as I am sure is yours, but I cannot let some members of this community think they can smack talk me, even if they are members of this list for many years and are usually positive contributors. Letting them getaway thinking they are the dogs bollox is not right. Now Evans, in response to your comments, I’m generally more of a lurker on this list than an active participant but … Craig, get a life. >>>> Hold on a second. Whats your problem?
Have I done
or said anything personal to you? You tell me to get a life? Do
you even know me? How dare you come out with a personal statement like that
without expecting some kind of response.
I gotta say Evans, you are not doing yourself any favours by blurting out such comments. Is this how you speak to all your clients Evans? Yes, I am a client of yours after buying your IP Plus product on Barry's recomendation and if this is how you conduct yourself then I would not recomend your product to anyone else and would urge Barry to do the same. I am not saying you have to talk to me in a special way, with me being a client, but I have to say that I will be thinking twice about sending you referals in future and recomemnding your product. I didn’t start seeing posts from you until February of this year >>> And so what? I
only started using declude on one of my Imail servers in Feb this year becasue
after the trial I discovered that the Declude package is a pretty good product
and this list, until Matts rant about Microsoft being a monopoly and how he is
going to invest more in Linux etc etc..... has been pretty good until now. I
have enjoyed reading the posts becasue they have been useful, not
useless. >>>> Big deal. Do you
want a medal? Matts ranting about Microsoft is not a positive contribution to
the declude discussion and thats what the list is for.
I value the opinions
of this group like I do no other. This community is both broad and deep in
their knowledge of all things IT related. You should be thankful to have
becoming a member of this community instead of being a nuisance.
On top of that you call
me a nuisance.
Please take your
accusations and your return receipt requests somewhere else if you can’t play
nice with the other children here.
As for the Read Receipts, I did not know that this was such a big issue
but seeing that I have not been told in a nice informative way then I am
not going to change my email configuration. Kindest Regards DISCLAIMER - This message may contain confidential,
proprietary or legally privileged information and is intended only for the use
of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this
message you are hereby informed that you must not use, disseminate, copy it in
any form or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message
in error please delete it and any copies of it and notify it to the
sender.
AVISO LEGAL - Este mensaje puede contener informacion confidencial, en
propiedad o legalmente protegida y esta dirigida unicamente para el uso de la
persona destinataria. Si usted no es la persona destinataria de este mensaje,
por la presente se le comunica que no debe usar, difundir, copiar de ninguna
forma, ni emprender ninguna accion en relacion con
ella. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Evans Martin Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 3:00 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Open License I’m generally more of a lurker on this list than an active participant but … Craig, get a life. I didn’t start seeing posts from you until February of this year. The rest of us have been here for many years and have made active contributions to the Declude community.
I value the opinions of this group like I do no other. This community is both broad and deep in their knowledge of all things IT related. You should be thankful to have becoming a member of this community instead of being a nuisance.
Please take your accusations and your return receipt requests somewhere else if you can’t play nice with the other children here.
Evans Martin
EVANS MARTIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] HOSTING: http://www.martek.net PROGRAMMING: http://www.martekware.com
iPlus Info Browser – IPB’s IMail Migration Tool, password browser, reporting suite make IPlus Info Browser something no IMail administrator should be without. http://www.martek.net/Default.aspx?tabid=96
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Craig
Edmonds
Matt,
Well Matt, all I care about is how to improve the performance of my declude install, thats what this list is for.
Probably why this list is called "DECLUDE.JUNKMAIL" not DECLUDE.CAFE.LETS.TALK.ABOUT.ABOUT.A.WIDE.RANGE.OF.TOPICS.
And Matt, this post.....
.....becasue this list is called DECLUDE.JUNKMAIL, I was under the impression that it had something to do with the Declude Junkmail filter, which is why I was interested in finding out what it was.
So dont try and point fingers at me mate.
I only caught the last posting of that thread and thought the ms smtp com had something to do with declude.
Kindest Regards
DISCLAIMER - This message may
contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information and is
intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the
intended recipient of this message you are hereby informed that you must not
use, disseminate, copy it in any form or take any action in reliance on it. If
you have received this message in error please delete it and any copies of it
and notify it to the sender. AVISO LEGAL - Este mensaje puede
contener informacion confidencial, en propiedad o legalmente protegida y esta
dirigida unicamente para el uso de la persona destinataria. Si usted no es la
persona destinataria de este mensaje, por la presente se le comunica que no debe
usar, difundir, copiar de ninguna forma, ni emprender ninguna accion en relacion
con
ella.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Matt Craig, ummmmm I thought this was a junk mail list aimed at discussing Declude?
I did not know it was to rant about Microsoft stuff?
Kindest Regards
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Matt Shayne (and Kevin), http://download.microsoft.com/download/b/9/b/b9b1f066-51c3-4983-9c53-e65ebe104abe/08-05-02_SummitVision_Microsoft.pdf Again, it's a crock if they want to try forcing this
upon SP's. Essentially they are saying that anonymous connections to IIS
need a special license now, and occasionally in the past when they could figure
out what their own licensing says or means, but only when you are providing
services to third-parties. Of course that also means that they sell
Windows Server Web Edition, but you can't use that for hosting Internet Web
sites for anyone except yourself unless you get it under SPLA. I think
not. Or how about any E-mail, FTP, DNS, Web server, etc. that runs on top
of Windows? They might want to claim that this is the only legitimate way
on the SPLA site, but the reality clearly is that hosting on the Internet does
not require SPLA, even if you sell services, otherwise thousands of companies
products and millions of their customers would be running on top of an
illegitimately licensed OS. It suggests that products such as Commerce
Server can't be bought at retail and used on the Internet, and it suggests that
the SQL Server per-processor licensing is only for intranet use even though they
clearly state that the license is most appropriate for Internet use and make no
differentiation among the type of entity, nor do they attempt to make you aware
of SPLA. Not enforcing the terms, nor providing for even basic awareness
of the 'proper' program could also make it unenforceable. I think that I'm
done... Matt, From: Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsoft Ope... Evans Martin
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsof... Craig Edmonds
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Micr... Fox,Thomas
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsof... Jay Sudowski - Handy Networks LLC
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Microsof... Robert E. Spivack
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Micr... Darin Cox