Yes. They are making a good point. The courts shouldn't allow spammers
to file SLAPP suits as a way to threaten blacklists out of the
business. Even though Spamhaus could have fought this and won quite
easily, the fact that one has to spend resources fighting SLAPP suits is
a threat in itself. This is more so a fight about the way that the US
court system approaches spammer litigation than it is fighting the
spammers itself. It's about time that the courts started throwing this
stuff out and even fining the litigants.
Matt
Jay Sudowski - Handy Networks LLC wrote:
Has anyone been following the SpamHaus debacle?
http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/20061009/anti-spam-lawsuit.htm
-----
Jay Sudowski // Handy Networks LLC
Director of Technical Operations
Providing Shared, Reseller, Semi Managed and Fully Managed Windows 2003
Hosting Solutions
Tel: 877-70 HANDY x882 | Fax: 888-300-2FAX
www.handynetworks.com
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
