Hi,
 
As a matter of fact he doesn't have to use weightrange in this case. I use:
SPAMSUBJECT weight  x x 12 0
SPAMHOLD weightrange x x 20 24
SPAMDELETE weight  x x 25 0
SPAMSUBJECT  SUBJECT [SPAM: %WEIGHT%]
SPAMHOLD  HOLD
SPAMDELETE  DELETE
As the delete action overrules the holdaction the weightrange is not really neccesary but it makes me feel good and is a bit cleaner.
I WANT the spamsubject action in case of held mail (anything over 12 points) as I want to have the ability to sort spam mail by points, this way I can do that by sorting it on the subject.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
hoofd systeembeheer

tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  / www.tio.nl
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 7:05 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] One step forward, ten back

Yes the can coexist but be sure to use weightrange to instead of weight.

SPAM-LOW weightrange x x 8 13
SPAM-MED weightrange x x 14 24
SPAM-HIGH weight x x 25 0

SPAM-LOW SUBJECT [%WEIGHT%]
SPAM-MED HOLD
SPAM-HIGH DELETE

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Dave Doherty
> Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 9:20 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] One step forward, ten back
>
>
> > I wondered if it's
> > possible to set another one higher to do the deleting, as
> I'm seeing a
> > lot of stuff at 40 or more.
>
> Absolutely. Several action directives can coexist peacefully in your
> $default$.junkmail file, like this:
>
> WEIGHT10 SUBJECT [%WEIGHT%]
> WEIGHT20 MAILBOX SPAM
> WEIGHT30 DELETE
>
> Any message scoring at least 10 will have the weight added at
> the head of
> the subject in brackets, like:
>
> [12] Buy My Stuff!
>
> Any message with 20-29 points will be diverted to the spam
> folder, and
> anything scoring 30+ will be deleted.
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Todd Richards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <declude.junkmail@declude.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 11:55 PM
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] One step forward, ten back
>
>
> >
> > Thanks Dave.  Actually, I do, but with settings of weight20
> <send to
> > spam
> > mailbox>.  I was worried about too many false positives.  I
> wondered
> > mailbox>if
> > it's
> > possible to set another one higher to do the deleting, as
> I'm seeing a
> > lot of stuff at 40 or more.
> >
> > As an update, I found that I had a discrepancy in my weights.  I
> > corrected that, and my filtering is doing great now.  I
> logged into my
> > spam mailbox a little bit ago and the few hundred messages
> that are in
> > there are definitely
> > spam.  So it's catching things now and keeping them from my
> mailbox -
> > which
> > was my main goal.  However, now I'd like to clean things up
> just a little
> > more...
> >
> > Todd
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> > Dave Doherty
> > Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 9:34 PM
> > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] One step forward, ten back
> >
> > It seems like you're detecting things OK, but not taking
> action on the
> > results.
> >
> > Make sure you have directives like
> >
> > WEIGHT14    MAILBOX SPAM
> > WEIGHT20    DELETE
> >
> > in your default.junkmail file
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Todd Richards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <declude.junkmail@declude.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 7:38 PM
> > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] One step forward, ten back
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Hi Everyone -
> >>
> >> We are getting completely hammered by spam and I'm about
> at my wits
> >> end. A few weeks ago I added a 30-day trial of Message
> Sniffer and it
> >> doesn't seem
> >> to be doing any good.  Today, I upgraded to the newest version of
> >> Declude.
> >> I "think" everything went ok.  After reading through the
> documentation
> >> (again) I went through my global.cfg file and cleaned up
> some things that
> >> were questionable.  For instance, we had several domains
> in the WHITELIST
> >> TO
> >> and WHITELIST FROM.  From what I've read and heard through
> the lists,
> >> it's
> >> not a good idea to whitelist anything.    In fact, earlier
> today I had
> >> some
> >> spam come through that was "from" a whitelisted domain so
> it just let it
> >> through.  So I commented them out and planned to watch my
> spam account
> >> (instead of deleting I have caught messages sent to
> another account for
> >> review) to see the results.
> >>
> >> So...  This happened about 5pm tonight.  I went through a
> short spurt
> >> but in the last 90 minutes since then I alone have
> received over 150
> >> spam messages.
> >> Before I made my changes tonight, that is about the number I would
> >> receive
> >> in one day (which is still too many).  In one message,
> this was in the
> >> header.  To me, it should have failed and been stopped.
> >>
> >> X-Declude-Scan: Incoming Score [39] at 17:59:29 on 02 Nov 2006
> >> X-Declude-Fail: CBL [6], FIVETEN-SRC [4], SPAMCOP [7], REVDNS [8],
> >> ROUTING
> >> [2], SNIFFER [12], WEIGHT10 [10], WEIGHT14 [14], WEIGHT20
> [20], WEIGHT20a
> >> [20]
> >>
> >> Does anyone have any suggestions to what I might be doing
> wrong, or
> >> what
> >> I
> >> should look at next?  Would anyone (off-list) be willing
> to look at my
> >> config files and see if something is apparently wrong? 
> Are there any
> >> sample
> >> files where a newbie might be able to see how others have
> theirs set up?
> >> I
> >> have been running Declude for over a year, and with the
> exception of some
> >> minor tweaks, it's pretty much running "out-of-the-box". 
> For those who
> >> are
> >> interested, I'm running Imail 8.22 (with latest hotfix) on
> Windows 2000
> >> server, as well as the Declude Suite, Message Sniffer, and
> inv-URBL 2.7.
> >>
> >> Thanks for any input or direction you can offer.
> >>
> >> Todd
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> >> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
> >> "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found at
> >> http://www.mail-archive.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
> > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found at
> > http://www.mail-archive.com.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
> > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found at
> > http://www.mail-archive.com.
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be
> found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to