Trend's PCScan.exe works well. The only problem is that the output is not easily parsed, so Declude's REPORT directive doesn't work(unless there has been an update I'm unaware of).
My approach for batch file based scanning was to put PCScan after F-Prot, under the presumption that F-Prot would catch most if not all of the virus traffic and Declude could pull the name from F-Prot. In the rare circumstances where F-Prot did not catch the virus and PCScan did, a missing virus name would not be a big problem. This has worked well. I see no reason why the same logic could not be applied to the applied to Declude's built-in multi-scanner approach. The question would be if Declude takes the virus name info from the first or last scanner to report and infection, then place F-Prot in that position. McAfee works well, but I'm still not 100% comfortable with the license. NOD32 and Kaspersky both have clean "server" based licenses without per-user encumbrances , but run a little more $. Jerry ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Setzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:29 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Mulitple A/V Scanners > > > > Norton does not work very well. McAfee works wonderfully. > > > I thought I had heard that about Norton. What about Trend? > > David > --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus". You can E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web site at http://www.declude.com .
