Re: RE: [DUG]: Interfaces

[Nic Wise]

> Ok, give a poor C++ programmer a hint... what are we talking about here?
>  <G> 

I think you lot call them "pure virtual classes" - ie a class with
no implementation. In Delphi, you can inherit from more than one of them, 
which is a big advantage.

> Specifically, I've seen many definitions for 'interfaces', but none of 
> them seems to quite fit the discussion.  Does some kind soul out there 
> feel like enlightening me? 

:)

N

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                  Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz
To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with body of "unsubscribe delphi"