+1

I like the idea of `master` being the active branch more.


----- "Mohammed Morsi" <[email protected]> wrote:

> A few of us were discussing possible changes to our git strategy today
> 
> and figure we'd ask around for additional feedback and ideas.
> 
> Currently our 'master' branch is viewed as pristine, we never touch it
> 
> until we have a release, at which point we merge our changes from our
> 
> development head 'next' or other special topic branches into it. This
> is 
> how the upstream git community manages their repository, though they
> are 
> the only other ones using this strategy that I know of. Their approach
> 
> seems to be different than ours though as their master and next
> branches 
> primarily consist of merge commits from others
> 
> https://github.com/git/git/commits/
> https://github.com/git/git/commits/next
> 
> Many other git based projects use master as the primary development 
> head, tagging various releases as they are ready, and branching only 
> when a separate development track is necessary. For example, the ruby
> 
> upstream community develops against master (technically against the 
> 'trunk' head in a svn repo which their git 'master' is a mirror of)
> with 
> branches for 1.8.7 and 1.9.1 development.
> 
> One of the benefits of doing it this way is that when developers 
> checkout the master branch (as would happen by default when one does a
> 
> git clone), they automatically have the latest development HEAD and do
> 
> not have to worry about or remember to switch branches before being
> able 
> to start development (though in practice its a good idea to create a
> new 
> local branch for any new changes).
> 
> Several of us wanted to change our git strategy to be more aligned
> with 
> this approach that many other projects make use of as well, but figure
> 
> it'd be best put up for a vote, so that any others with opinions 
> regarding this could have a say. If you're interested, please response
> 
> with a (+/-)1 and any thoughts.
> 
> Thanks alot,
>     -Mo
> _______________________________________________
> deltacloud-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/deltacloud-devel
_______________________________________________
deltacloud-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/deltacloud-devel

Reply via email to