hi mark, you are right - however, that's also only a basic agreement (see NarrowingBeanBuilder and AnnotatedTypeBuilder)
regards, gerhard 2012/1/2 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > Nope, we have AnnotatedTypeBuilder. This is really a big must > > + we have the test structure. > > LieGrue, > strub > > PS: no worries Jason, family always comes first! > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: > > Sent: Monday, January 2, 2012 1:42 AM > > Subject: Re: Project Planning > > > > hi jason, > > > > thx for the info. > > (i'm sorry to hear that.) > > > > @your upcoming commits: > > > > it would be nice if you can provide the infrastructure for in-container > > arquillian tests. > > > > currently we don't have a single solder feature we agreed on. > > basically we agreed on @Veto in general, but we haven't agreed on the > name > > and therefore we need a formal vote. > > i'm not sure whether or not we should postpone the vote for some days > > (until more community members are back). > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > > > > > > > 2012/1/2 Jason Porter <[email protected]> > > > >> I'll get on the commit wagon shortly. With the Red Hat company shut > > down > >> last week, coupled with my wife's emergency trip to see her father > > before > >> he passes I've been busy with three of our kids. I'm hoping to > > commit some > >> tomorrow, Tuesday for sure when my wife is back and I'm not playing Mom > > and > >> Dad :) > >> > >> Sent from my iPhone > >> > >> On Jan 1, 2012, at 17:10, "John D. Ament" > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > So (and this is going to sound extremely cliche) > >> > What can I do to help? > >> > Cuz right now I see lots of commits from you and strub, Lots of > >> discusses. > >> > > >> > John > >> > > >> > On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Gerhard Petracek < > >> [email protected] > >> >> wrote: > >> > > >> >> hi john, > >> >> > >> >> jason did that already for solder. > >> >> > >> >> in general: > >> >> we added all parts to [1] and created tasks [2] to discuss them on > > the > >> >> mailing list (see the "[DISCUSS] ..." mails). > >> >> we started to discuss the features with the highest ranking. as > > soon as > >> we > >> >> agree on a feature, we create a "feature"-ticket (e.g. > > [3]) and it gets > >> >> committed to deltaspike. > >> >> afterwards we continue with the next feature/s > >> >> > >> >> regards, > >> >> gerhard > >> >> > >> >> [1] > >> >> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DeltaSpike/SE+Feature+Ranking > >> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-2 > >> >> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-21 > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> 2012/1/2 John D. Ament <[email protected]> > >> >> > >> >>> Hi All > >> >>> > >> >>> Was wondering, since I'm new at this and completely lost, > > how do we go > >> >>> about putting features into deltaspike? Let's say I love > > something in > >> >>> Solder and figure that would be great for deltaspike, do I > > just create > >> a > >> >>> JIRA, email the group saying I want XXXX and here's why? > > Maybe I > >> missed > >> >> an > >> >>> on boarding seminar somewhere .. :-) > >> >>> > >> >>> Thanks, > >> >>> > >> >>> John > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > > >
