+1 (for such cases we just need votes if we can't agree on something - maybe we can agree on an approach. we haven't even discussed it.)
regards, gerhard 2012/1/2 Jason Porter <[email protected]> > We could just add AnnotatedTypeBuilder and then refactor it if needed > based on the vote outcome. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jan 1, 2012, at 18:08, Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > hi mark, > > > > you are right - however, that's also only a basic agreement > > (see NarrowingBeanBuilder and AnnotatedTypeBuilder) > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > > > > > > > 2012/1/2 Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > > > >> Nope, we have AnnotatedTypeBuilder. This is really a big must > >> > >> + we have the test structure. > >> > >> LieGrue, > >> strub > >> > >> PS: no worries Jason, family always comes first! > >> > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >>> From: Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> > >>> To: [email protected] > >>> Cc: > >>> Sent: Monday, January 2, 2012 1:42 AM > >>> Subject: Re: Project Planning > >>> > >>> hi jason, > >>> > >>> thx for the info. > >>> (i'm sorry to hear that.) > >>> > >>> @your upcoming commits: > >>> > >>> it would be nice if you can provide the infrastructure for in-container > >>> arquillian tests. > >>> > >>> currently we don't have a single solder feature we agreed on. > >>> basically we agreed on @Veto in general, but we haven't agreed on the > >> name > >>> and therefore we need a formal vote. > >>> i'm not sure whether or not we should postpone the vote for some days > >>> (until more community members are back). > >>> > >>> regards, > >>> gerhard > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> 2012/1/2 Jason Porter <[email protected]> > >>> > >>>> I'll get on the commit wagon shortly. With the Red Hat company shut > >>> down > >>>> last week, coupled with my wife's emergency trip to see her father > >>> before > >>>> he passes I've been busy with three of our kids. I'm hoping to > >>> commit some > >>>> tomorrow, Tuesday for sure when my wife is back and I'm not playing > Mom > >>> and > >>>> Dad :) > >>>> > >>>> Sent from my iPhone > >>>> > >>>> On Jan 1, 2012, at 17:10, "John D. Ament" > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> So (and this is going to sound extremely cliche) > >>>>> What can I do to help? > >>>>> Cuz right now I see lots of commits from you and strub, Lots of > >>>> discusses. > >>>>> > >>>>> John > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Gerhard Petracek < > >>>> [email protected] > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> hi john, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> jason did that already for solder. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> in general: > >>>>>> we added all parts to [1] and created tasks [2] to discuss them on > >>> the > >>>>>> mailing list (see the "[DISCUSS] ..." mails). > >>>>>> we started to discuss the features with the highest ranking. as > >>> soon as > >>>> we > >>>>>> agree on a feature, we create a "feature"-ticket (e.g. > >>> [3]) and it gets > >>>>>> committed to deltaspike. > >>>>>> afterwards we continue with the next feature/s > >>>>>> > >>>>>> regards, > >>>>>> gerhard > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [1] > >>>>>> > >>>> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DeltaSpike/SE+Feature+Ranking > >>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-2 > >>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-21 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 2012/1/2 John D. Ament <[email protected]> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi All > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Was wondering, since I'm new at this and completely lost, > >>> how do we go > >>>>>>> about putting features into deltaspike? Let's say I love > >>> something in > >>>>>>> Solder and figure that would be great for deltaspike, do I > >>> just create > >>>> a > >>>>>>> JIRA, email the group saying I want XXXX and here's why? > >>> Maybe I > >>>> missed > >>>>>> an > >>>>>>> on boarding seminar somewhere .. :-) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> John > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> >
