What CDI mechanism would you use instead? On 5 Mar 2012, at 08:47, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
> +0 > no -1 because there are use-cases for it. > no +1 because i would use std. cdi mechanisms instead. > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2012/3/4 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> > >> hi john, >> >> the sub-task is perfectly fine. >> >> regards, >> gerhard >> >> >> >> 2012/3/4 John D. Ament <[email protected]> >> >> Hi All >>> >>> I wanted to bring up the subject of ServiceHandler. I added 113 as a >>> child >>> of DELTASPIKE-2, looked appropriate but not 100% sure (so please let me >>> know if you think it's not appropriate as a child). ServiceHandler is a >>> feature in Solder that allows you to define an interceptor that manages >>> generic calls against an injected interface. The API is as follows: >>> >>> - @ServiceHandlerType(Class<?> clazz) - placed on an annotation that would >>> be placed on the interface. Indicates what interceptor would be invoked >>> for calls against this interface. >>> >>> It's then up to the application developer/framework author to define >>> annotations that go on methods, as well as the interceptor itself that >>> will >>> be invoked. The feature for ServiceHandler would be to provide the API of >>> the type and then the infrastructure required to make the interceptor be >>> called. Existing documentation of the feature: >>> >>> http://docs.jboss.org/seam/3/3.1.0.Final/reference/en-US/html/solder-servicehandler.html >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> john >>> >> >>
