if you have a lot of shared code, you can extract it in 1-n method/s or an abstract class which is still easier than a new concept. at least i haven't seen an use-case which really needed it. that was the reason for a +0 (which still means that i'm ok with adding it).
regards, gerhard 2012/3/6 Pete Muir <[email protected]> > So, you mean just write a bean with all the boilerplate code in it? > > On 6 Mar 2012, at 15:58, Gerhard Petracek wrote: > > > hi pete, > > > > instead of the interface you can just implement a bean which does the > same. > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > > > > > > > 2012/3/6 Pete Muir <[email protected]> > > > >> What CDI mechanism would you use instead? > >> > >> On 5 Mar 2012, at 08:47, Gerhard Petracek wrote: > >> > >>> +0 > >>> no -1 because there are use-cases for it. > >>> no +1 because i would use std. cdi mechanisms instead. > >>> > >>> regards, > >>> gerhard > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> 2012/3/4 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> > >>> > >>>> hi john, > >>>> > >>>> the sub-task is perfectly fine. > >>>> > >>>> regards, > >>>> gerhard > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 2012/3/4 John D. Ament <[email protected]> > >>>> > >>>> Hi All > >>>>> > >>>>> I wanted to bring up the subject of ServiceHandler. I added 113 as a > >>>>> child > >>>>> of DELTASPIKE-2, looked appropriate but not 100% sure (so please let > me > >>>>> know if you think it's not appropriate as a child). ServiceHandler > is > >> a > >>>>> feature in Solder that allows you to define an interceptor that > manages > >>>>> generic calls against an injected interface. The API is as follows: > >>>>> > >>>>> - @ServiceHandlerType(Class<?> clazz) - placed on an annotation that > >> would > >>>>> be placed on the interface. Indicates what interceptor would be > >> invoked > >>>>> for calls against this interface. > >>>>> > >>>>> It's then up to the application developer/framework author to define > >>>>> annotations that go on methods, as well as the interceptor itself > that > >>>>> will > >>>>> be invoked. The feature for ServiceHandler would be to provide the > >> API of > >>>>> the type and then the infrastructure required to make the interceptor > >> be > >>>>> called. Existing documentation of the feature: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > http://docs.jboss.org/seam/3/3.1.0.Final/reference/en-US/html/solder-servicehandler.html > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards, > >>>>> > >>>>> john > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > >
