Hi Bernard! There are much better ways for configuration than creating beans via XML. I considered this as kind of abuse in Spring and I still don't like it. We also already have a configuration system + we even have ProjectStage specific behaviour change with @Exclude.
LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: Bernard Łabno <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 9:43 AM > Subject: Re: XML Config > > If you find elegant way to do everything that can be currently done then > it's cool not to use XML, but if we won't be able to i.e. configure bean > properties between compilation and deployment then it will be great > disappointment. > > 2012/9/10 Charles Moulliard <[email protected]> > >> I would prefer that we avoid to use XML. Otherwise, end users will be >> confused about what a CDI / CDI Extension should looks like and why we are >> moving one step down to do what Spring / Xbean are doing. >> >> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> > Why i would like to use files (i find xml too verbose) is for > constants >> > (uri for instance) or alternative/interceptor (as mentionned) >> > >> > Today i find other use case the translation of bad design >> > >> > ...just my opinion maybe >> > Le 7 sept. 2012 23:01, "Jason Porter" > <[email protected]> a écrit >> : >> > >> > > Mark, Pete and I discussed a little bit about the XML config > (from >> > Solder) >> > > on IRC today. We quickly decided that we needed to move over to > the >> > mailing >> > > list for more input, and to make things official. >> > > >> > > As things currently exist in the Solder XML Config, it's > probably not >> > > portable and would really need some of the changes in CDI 1.1 to > work >> > > properly. We also discussed throwing out the idea of completely >> > configuring >> > > beans via XML and using the XML config for other tasks such as > applying >> > > interceptors and the like via regex or similar ideas, in other > words >> > having >> > > it being a subset of what currently exists today. What is in > Solder is >> > very >> > > similar to configuring beans via XML in Spring, and we feel that >> paradigm >> > > has sailed. >> > > >> > > I'm starting this thread to get some other ideas about what > we should >> do >> > > for XML config and also see what people think. >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Jason Porter >> > > http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com >> > > http://twitter.com/lightguardjp >> > > >> > > Software Engineer >> > > Open Source Advocate >> > > Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling >> > > >> > > PGP key id: 926CCFF5 >> > > PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Charles Moulliard >> Apache Committer / Sr. Pr. Consultant at FuseSource.com >> Twitter : @cmoulliard >> Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >> >
